Here’s the brief. And here’s the relevant fn: 14 Some of Respondents’ amici make the scurrilous suggestion that Petitioners’ interpretation would enable state legislatures to change the result of a Presidential election by replacingpopularly chosen electors with their own slate. … Continue reading Reply Brief Filed in Moore v. Harper Case Before Supreme Court Oral Argument Dec. 7; Petitioners Make Clear that ISL Theory Should Not Be Used to Steal Elections